This is how CSIOP defines I-O
“The Canadian Society for Industrial
and Organizational Psychology (CSIOP)
is an organization whose mission is to
further the welfare of people by: (a)
helping organizations effectively manage
their human resources, (b) scientifically
investigating human behaviour and
cognition at work, and (c) helping
individuals realize their work goals,
including helping them to maximize job
satisfaction and productivity and minimize
work stress.”
Not a bad definition, all things
considered. It’s not terribly concrete,
though.
Sectors I-O psychologists work
When it comes to career paths, I-O is
not short on options. They include:
•
Academia (colleges, universities)
•
Consulting
•
Industry (for-profit and not-for-
profit)
•
Government (public servants)
•
Hybrids of the above (e.g., research
institutes, think-tanks, health-care)
That pretty much covers everywhere a
human works. And if you refer back to
CSIOP’s description on the left, that
pretty much covers everything humans
do at work.
So, basically, I-O psychologists study
and influence the thoughts, feelings,
and behaviours of humans at work. In
terms of career advice, this is about as
useful as a fortune cookie.
(Actually, SIOP does have more detailed
resources that can aid in identifying and
planning possible I-O career paths.)
I-O psychology is not a “job”
According to their brochures, colleges
and other vocational schools train you
for “jobs.” That’s all well and good, but a
job is what is referred to as a social
construction: A group of people (e.g.,
society) have agreed that a particular
set of tasks, duties, and problems to be
solved form a category called [insert job
title here.] This taxonomic convenience
is useful when your kid announces that
he wants to be a firefighter when he
grows up. The alternative is little Bobby
telling you that when he grows up, he
wants to control and extinguish fires or
respond to emergency situations where
life, property, or the environment is at
risk, drawing upon the following
knowledges, skills, and abilities ... [yada
yada yada]. This is a simple and readily
understood example because the
general public knows—or thinks they
know—what a firefighter is and does.
Alternatively, if Bobby says he wants to
be a “consultant”, you’d think a) who’s
Bobby hanging out with? and b) what
kind of consultant does he mean?
Describing a consultant is not quite as
straightforward as describing a
firefighter. There are consultants willing
to give advice on almost any topic, using
any method you can imagine. Similarly,
defining what an I-O psychologist does
is like nailing Jell-o to a wall. Hence, the
use of “sectors” (see above) rather than
“jobs” when discussing what I-O
psychologists do: it’s more manageable
and informative.
Think of I-O psychology as a toolbox: It
contains a vast array of different tools
to fix a wide range of problems in all
sorts of different ways. A full and
comprehensive toolbox gives you the
most flexibility in fixing different
problems, but even a small number of
tools have their place and don’t
necessarily have to be used by a
handyman. (Analogies are not my
strong suit).
What I-O psychologists do
Right off the bat, you should know that
the title of this section is erroneous and
misleading. If you noticed, test passed.
If you didn’t, read the section to the left.
To give you more concrete examples of
what I-O trained people can do, here’s a
brief and incomplete list of activities.
Note that the activities listed could be
performed by people with other “jobs”
such as a human resources director, an
advertising consultant, or a vocational
guidance counsellor. What we DON’T do
is therapy.
•
Design/select tests or interview
formats to guide employers in who
they should hire and for what
positions
•
Develop and facilitate performance
evaluations to assess individual
employees and the organization as
a whole
•
Provide relevant training to
managers.
•
Determine needs of new and
existing employees and
develop/evaluate related training
programs (e.g., technical or
diversity training
•
Advise an organization’s attorneys
(such as when faced with litigation
cases concerning employees)
•
Analyze a company’s job positions
to determine if employees are
treated fairly and legally
•
Design, evaluate, or advise on
systems that promote employee
satisfaction, organizational
performance, and fill employee
needs, such as incentives and
rewards, on-site childcare, fulfilling
job tasks, and more
•
Evaluate customer satisfaction
Greg A. Chung-Yan, PhD
Industrial-Organizational
Psychology
INDUSTRIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
EXPLAINED
WHY STUDY I-O
PSYCHOLOGY?
I-O Psychology is useful
In mixed company, when asked to
describe Industrial-Organizational (I-O)
psychology, I usually don’t know what to
say. I want to make it sound both
important and interesting, while at the
same time not sounding like a puffed-up,
out-of-touch academic. Try doing that in a
tight 2 minutes. The damn title alone is 14
syllables long.
Here’s an assortment of my failed
attempts.
•
It’s like human resources
management only more scientific.
•
Unlike business schools, we don’t
only tell you what to do, but why
you’re doing it.
•
When you apply for jobs, all that
stuff you go through, I-O
psychologists developed them.
•
Some of us do executive coaching,
helping managers who are stalled
in their careers. Other stuff, too.
•
“Industrial” is like human
resources; “Organizational” is
closer to what you think of when
you think of psychology; behaviour
in organizations, teamwork, sh*t
like that.
FAIL! And to think I’ve had 20 years to
come up with a better response.
The irony: I-O psychology is both
important and interesting. More than
that, you develop employable skills, it’s
relevant to your life now, and you can
have a direct impact on people’s lives. You
also have more career options than in
other areas of psychology.
I think part of the problem is that the
arenas in which I-O psychologists work
are so vast and varied that it defies pithy
description. We also don’t want to sound
like hacks that use business-speak like
“capitalizing on human potential”;
“leveraging talent”; and prefacing
anything with “synergizing.” Using nouns
as verbs should only be done as broad
satire.
In an effort to stop embarrassing myself,
I’ve attempted to explain what we do
here. Some of it is adapted from the
websites of the Canadian Society for
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
(CSIOP); and the Society for Industrial and
Organizational Psychology (SIOP).
Also known as (AKA)
Industrial-Organizational Psychology is
referred to by other names and also
subsumes other popularly known topics.
•
Personnel psychology
•
Work psychology
•
Organizational behaviour
•
Human resources management
•
Labour relations
•
Human factors and ergonomics
•
Vocational guidance
Journals frequently referred to by I-O
researchers and business professionals
•
Journal of Applied Psychology
•
Academy of Management Journal
•
Personnel Psychology
•
Journal of Business and Psychology
•
Journal of Organizational Behavior
•
Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology
•
Industrial and Organizational
Psychology: Perspectives on
Science and Practice
•
…and many more.